• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RJS Law - A Tax Law Firm

RJS Law: San Diego Tax Attorney & Lawyer | CPA | IRS | FTB | California

Header Right

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA’S FINEST
LAW FIRM

COMPLIMENTARY CASE EVALUATION

SAN DIEGO
(619) 595-1655
ORANGE COUNTY
(949) 535-2000
El CAJON
(619) 595-1655
  • Home
  • About
    • Ronson J. Shamoun, JD, LL.M.
    • Chandara Diep, JD, LL.M.
    • Joseph Cole, JD, LL.M.
    • Brendan O’Connor, CPA, MST, JD, LL.M.
    • Ashley E. Teague, ESQ.
    • Brian M. Malloy, Esq.
    • Quinn Disparte, JD, LL.M.
    • Martin Schainbaum, JD, LL.M.
    • Melanie M. Shamoun
    • Sandie Portilla
    • Renae Arabo
    • Sabri P. Shamoun
    • Hilary Dargavell
    • Lupita C. Torres
    • Leandro Favano
    • Jewell Cornejo
    • Devon J. Arabo
    • Christopher Engelmann
    • Gwendolyn K. Davis
  • Services
    • Tax
      • IRS TAX MATTERS
        • IRS Appeals
          • IRS Appeals Process
          • Contesting an IRS Levy
          • Why Retain RJS Law for your IRS Appeal?
          • 4 Tips For Navigating The IRS Rapid Appeals Process
        • IRS AUDITS
          • IRS Correspondence Audits
          • IRS Field Audits
          • Initial Compliance Center Audits
          • IRS Office Audits
          • What to Expect During an IRS Audit?
          • Taxpayer Rights Under IRS Publication 1
          • IRS Warns Taxpayers About Scam
        • IRS Collections
          • Avoiding and Eliminating IRS Tax Liens
          • Collection Due Process Hearings
          • CP 501 – IRS Notice
          • Failure to file a tax return: What happens?
          • How the IRS calculates interest
          • How to get a tax levy released
          • IRS Automated Collections
          • IRS Collections Process
          • IRS Interest Abatement
          • IRS Revenue Officers
          • Jeopardy Assessments and Jeopardy Levies
          • National Tax Agencies
          • Our Approach to Collections
          • Statute of Limitations on Collections
          • Streamlined Installment Agreements
          • TAX PENALTIES
          • Tax Penalty Abatement
          • Taxpayer Assistance Orders
        • IRS Payroll Tax Matters
          • Independent Contractor Reclassification Audits
          • IRS Forms 940 and 941
          • IRS Trust Fund Interviews
          • Payroll Tax Liability Payment Options
          • The Trust Fund Recovery Penalty
        • IRS Wealth Squad
        • Offer in Compromise & Tax Settlements
          • OVERVIEW OF OFFER IN COMPROMISE PROCESS
          • The Offer in Compromise Process
          • Appealing a Rejected Offer in Compromise
          • How the IRS evaluates an Offer in Compromise
          • Offer in Compromise and Dissipated Assets
          • Offer in Compromise Requirements
          • Pros and Cons of an Offer in Compromise
          • Why Retain RJS Law?
          • Offer in Compromise Alternatives
          • Actual IRS Offer in Compromise Results
      • STATE TAX MATTERS
        • EDD California Payroll Tax Lawyer
          • EDD Investigations
          • EDD Collections – Liens, Levies, and Garnishments
        • California Sales Tax
          • California Sales Tax Appeals
          • California Sales Tax Audits
          • California Department Of Tax And Fee Administration
        • California State Tax Matters
          • California Residency Audits
          • Discharging State Income Taxes in Bankruptcy
          • State Tax Practice – Outside of California
      • CRIMINAL TAX ISSUES
        • Criminal Investigation Division
        • IRS Criminal Investigation Division Tactics
        • Criminal Tax Defense – Tax Crimes
        • Currency Transaction Records & Suspicious Activity Reports
        • IRS Methods of Proof: Tax Fraud and Evasion
        • Methods IRS Agents Use to Locate Assets
        • IRS Special Agent Visits
        • Are You a Criminal Investigation Target?
        • Criminal Tax Attorney vs. White Collar Defense
      • International Taxes
      • CORPORATE TAXES
      • TAX COURT LITIGATION
      • Innocent Spouse Relief
    • Estate Planning
    • Trust, Estate & Probate Litigation
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Probate
    • Bankruptcy
    • Criminal Defense
    • Corporate & Transactional
    • Private Wealth Services
    • Real Estate Law
      • Landlord Tenant Law
    • Employment Law
    • NOTICES
      • IRS Notices
      • IRS Letters
      • FTB Notices
      • Avisos en Español
  • Tax Institute
  • Blog
  • Testimonials
  • Giving
    • RJS Law Donates Billboard to the Girl Scouts
  • Awards
    • Events
    • SD Metro San Diego’s Top Attorneys 2020
    • SD50 Extraordinary Leadership
    • Media
    • Video Gallery
    • USD Feature Story
    • Publications
  • Contact

WINNER OF THE UNION TRIBUNE SAN DIEGO'S BEST TAX LAW FIRM

 


5 YEARS IN A ROW

Call
Contact
Blog
  • Home
  • About
    • Ronson J. Shamoun, JD, LL.M.
    • Chandara Diep, JD, LL.M.
    • Joseph Cole, JD, LL.M.
    • Brendan O’Connor, CPA, MST, JD, LL.M.
    • Ashley E. Teague, ESQ.
    • Brian M. Malloy, Esq.
    • Quinn Disparte, JD, LL.M.
    • Martin Schainbaum, JD, LL.M.
    • Melanie M. Shamoun
    • Sandie Portilla
    • Renae Arabo
    • Sabri P. Shamoun
    • Hilary Dargavell
    • Lupita C. Torres
    • Leandro Favano
    • Jewell Cornejo
    • Devon J. Arabo
    • Christopher Engelmann
    • Gwendolyn K. Davis
  • Services
    • Tax
      • IRS TAX MATTERS
        • IRS Appeals
          • IRS Appeals Process
          • Contesting an IRS Levy
          • Why Retain RJS Law for your IRS Appeal?
          • 4 Tips For Navigating The IRS Rapid Appeals Process
        • IRS AUDITS
          • IRS Correspondence Audits
          • IRS Field Audits
          • Initial Compliance Center Audits
          • IRS Office Audits
          • What to Expect During an IRS Audit?
          • Taxpayer Rights Under IRS Publication 1
          • IRS Warns Taxpayers About Scam
        • IRS Collections
          • Avoiding and Eliminating IRS Tax Liens
          • Collection Due Process Hearings
          • CP 501 – IRS Notice
          • Failure to file a tax return: What happens?
          • How the IRS calculates interest
          • How to get a tax levy released
          • IRS Automated Collections
          • IRS Collections Process
          • IRS Interest Abatement
          • IRS Revenue Officers
          • Jeopardy Assessments and Jeopardy Levies
          • National Tax Agencies
          • Our Approach to Collections
          • Statute of Limitations on Collections
          • Streamlined Installment Agreements
          • TAX PENALTIES
          • Tax Penalty Abatement
          • Taxpayer Assistance Orders
        • IRS Payroll Tax Matters
          • Independent Contractor Reclassification Audits
          • IRS Forms 940 and 941
          • IRS Trust Fund Interviews
          • Payroll Tax Liability Payment Options
          • The Trust Fund Recovery Penalty
        • IRS Wealth Squad
        • Offer in Compromise & Tax Settlements
          • OVERVIEW OF OFFER IN COMPROMISE PROCESS
          • The Offer in Compromise Process
          • Appealing a Rejected Offer in Compromise
          • How the IRS evaluates an Offer in Compromise
          • Offer in Compromise and Dissipated Assets
          • Offer in Compromise Requirements
          • Pros and Cons of an Offer in Compromise
          • Why Retain RJS Law?
          • Offer in Compromise Alternatives
          • Actual IRS Offer in Compromise Results
      • STATE TAX MATTERS
        • EDD California Payroll Tax Lawyer
          • EDD Investigations
          • EDD Collections – Liens, Levies, and Garnishments
        • California Sales Tax
          • California Sales Tax Appeals
          • California Sales Tax Audits
          • California Department Of Tax And Fee Administration
        • California State Tax Matters
          • California Residency Audits
          • Discharging State Income Taxes in Bankruptcy
          • State Tax Practice – Outside of California
      • CRIMINAL TAX ISSUES
        • Criminal Investigation Division
        • IRS Criminal Investigation Division Tactics
        • Criminal Tax Defense – Tax Crimes
        • Currency Transaction Records & Suspicious Activity Reports
        • IRS Methods of Proof: Tax Fraud and Evasion
        • Methods IRS Agents Use to Locate Assets
        • IRS Special Agent Visits
        • Are You a Criminal Investigation Target?
        • Criminal Tax Attorney vs. White Collar Defense
      • International Taxes
      • CORPORATE TAXES
      • TAX COURT LITIGATION
      • Innocent Spouse Relief
    • Estate Planning
    • Trust, Estate & Probate Litigation
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Probate
    • Bankruptcy
    • Criminal Defense
    • Corporate & Transactional
    • Private Wealth Services
    • Real Estate Law
      • Landlord Tenant Law
    • Employment Law
    • NOTICES
      • IRS Notices
      • IRS Letters
      • FTB Notices
      • Avisos en Español
  • Tax Institute
  • Blog
  • Testimonials
  • Giving
    • RJS Law Donates Billboard to the Girl Scouts
  • Awards
    • Events
    • SD Metro San Diego’s Top Attorneys 2020
    • SD50 Extraordinary Leadership
    • Media
    • Video Gallery
    • USD Feature Story
    • Publications
  • Contact

Leave a Comment

How Are Stock Options Taxed

How Are Stock Options Taxed

How a Little Tax Case Called Altera May Affect Your Paycheck

We live in tumultuous times.  The COVID 19 Pandemic, murder hornets, politics, and who knows what else are occupying the headlines.  Beneath it all lies an important tax case called Altera Corporation v. the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (“Altera”).  This case involves how stock options are taxed and its outcome may have far ranging impact on thousands of Americans who receive stock options as compensation from their employers. The US Supreme Court recently declined to hear the case, but the tax issues how stock options are taxed, and the impact on thousands of American workers may be far from settled. 

There is a lot to unpack with this case.  It involves administrative law issues and complex regulations that we will not elaborate too much on, but the core question for us is whether multi-national companies will recognize taxable income in the US when they issue stock options to US employees who develop technology and other intellectual property.

Transfer Pricing Regulations

To give us a starting point, Altera involves transfer pricing regulations that are created to prevent tax abuses that could occur when two related companies (like a parent company and subsidiary) have a transaction.  Let us take a US Company that has a Cayman Islands subsidiary as an example.  The US Company’s tax rate is much higher than the Cayman Islands subsidiary.  Let us say the US Company has profits of $10 million a year. In a world without transfer pricing regulations, the US Company could rent a 200 square foot office from its own Cayman Islands subsidiary at a rate of $10 million per year.  The US Company would claim a $10 million per year deduction on its US tax return and wipe out its taxable profits. The Cayman Islands subsidiary would have $10 million of income which really would not matter much because the tax rate in the Cayman Islands is zero. 

Transfer pricing regulations prevent these abuses by generally providing that transactions between related companies will be treated for tax purposes as if they resembled arm’s length transactions between unrelated companies.  In the above example, the transfer pricing regulations would not allow a US company to claim a $10 million per year deduction for renting a 200 square foot office from its own Cayman Island’s subsidiary.  It would only be able to claim a deduction equal to the fair market value of rent would be (which is going to be far less than $10 million per year).  The US Company ends up paying tax on the $10 million of income it earned (as it should). 

Transfers of Intellectual Property and Other Intangibles

Things get more complicated when it comes to intellectual property and other intangibles being transferred between related companies.  The Altera case involved a US Corporation (we will call it Altera US) that developed electronic components and had a Cayman Islands subsidiary (we will call it Altera CI). To lower its tax bill, Altera US transferred its worldwide rights on its electronic component technologies to Altera CI.  Altera CI, not Altera US, would recognize the taxable income from the worldwide rights on the technology and thus Altera US lowered its US tax bill by lowering its taxable income. 

There is potential for abuse if a company like Altera US transfers the worldwide rights to its technology or other intellectual properties to offshore subsidiaries like Altera CI.  Just as a US based company should not get to claim a $10 million deduction for renting an office from itself, a US based company should not be able to give away the worldwide rights on lucrative technologies.  The transfer pricing regulations include cost sharing agreement regulations which target this type of potential abuse. 

The Cost Sharing Agreement regulations imagine companies like Altera US and Altera CI enter into a cost sharing agreement to share R&D costs almost as if they were unrelated companies entering into a deal to develop technology.  Altera CI compensates Altera US a “reasonable” amount to develop the electronic components under the cost sharing agreement.  Altera US claims income on its US tax return money it receives from Altera CI to develop the electronic components.  Altera US is still better off tax wise because it is not being taxed in the United States for the worldwide income of its electronic components, but it is not completely running away without paying tax.  It is still reporting income it “receives” from its Cost Sharing Agreement with Altera CI on its US tax return.

Altera Corporation v. the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service

The regulations that govern these cost sharing agreements are quite complicated and we will not go into them in detail, but the issue in dispute within the Altera matter is whether American companies in cost sharing agreements should include stock compensation as part of the cost sharing agreement.  In other words, should Altera US get reimbursed by Altera CI under the cost sharing agreement when it gives Altera US employees stock options.  The cost sharing regulations require companies like Altera US to be reimbursed by its subsidiary, which would result in companies like Altera US paying more income tax in the US when they give employees stock options.

Altera US challenged the regulation in Tax Court.  The Tax Court found the regulations requiring Altera US to share the costs of employee stock options were not valid.  The IRS appealed the Tax Court’s decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (which hears appeals from California and some other western states).  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the Tax Court decision and upheld the regulation. This means under the Ninth Circuit Court decision companies like Altera will recognize income when they grant employees stock options.  Altera is now petitioning the United States Supreme Court to hear the case and settle the matter once and for all.

The Supreme Court declined to hear Altera’s case which means the ruling of the Ninth Circuit stands for Altera.  This means that companies in the Ninth Circuit’s jurisdiction will have to recognize income when they grant employees stock options.  It is not certain whether courts in other circuits’ jurisdiction will agree with the Ninth Circuit.

Will the Outcome of Altera Affect You?

While tax issues like transfer pricing and cost sharing agreements are arcane, the issues in this case have real world consequences for thousands of American workers who work in technology, pharmaceuticals, entertainment, and other industries that use cost sharing agreements.  Workers are often compensated with company stock options. 

While Altera may have lost the battle, the war over the tax treatment of stock options may not be over.  As it now stands, the Tax Court (which hears cases from all over the United States) ruled that companies with cost sharing agreements do not have to pay more income tax when they issue stock options to employees.  The Ninth Circuit Court ruled that companies with cost sharing agreements do have to pay income tax when they issue stock options to employees.  This could possibly lead to two (or perhaps more) sets of tax laws governing different parts of the country. Companies outside the Ninth Circuit’s jurisdiction may argue the Tax Court’s decision applies to them and they should not recognize income when they issue stock options.  This makes the issuance of stock options more favorable for employers.   

There are many advantages to companies offering stock options to their employees and we cannot anticipate companies completely abandoning the practice any time in the immediate future because of Altera’s defeat.  However, if another court in another case rules favorably for a company like Altera, don’t be surprised if your company’s HR department contacts you about your compensation package. 

Published by Joe Cole

About Us

Filed Under: Stock Options, Tax Tips

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Contact Us

Recent Posts

  • WHERE’S THE MONEY, LEBOWSKI? CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 19
  • California Franchise Tax Board’s Top 500 Delinquent Taxpayer List
  • California Franchise Tax Board – Can You Ever Leave the Hotel California?

Categories

  • Bank Fraud
  • Bankruptcy
  • CARES Act
  • Company News
  • Contracts
  • Coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • Cryptocurrency
  • E-Commerce
  • Economic Stimulus
  • EDD
  • EDD Audit
  • Estate Planning
  • FTB Audits
  • FTB Collections
  • FTB Issues
  • Guardianship
  • How-To Legal Advice
  • IRS
  • IRS Appeals
  • IRS Audits
  • IRS Collections
  • IRS Forms Explained
  • IRS Issues
  • IRS Notices
  • IRS OVDI
  • IRS Website
  • Levies
  • Liens
  • Mail Fraud
  • No Worries Law Firm
  • Offer in Compromise
  • PPP Loan
  • Revocable Trust
  • RJS LAW In The Community
  • San Diego Law Firm
  • SBOE Audits
  • SBOE Issues
  • Small Business
  • Stock Options
  • Tax Attorney
  • Tax Law
  • Tax Tips
  • Uncategorized
  • Unemployment

Footer

Legal Resources

  • Payments
  • Services
  • Tax Law Blog
  • Video Gallery

SAN DIEGO

Map & Directions
FREE Underground parking in building

303 A Street
Suite 400
San Diego, CA 92101

Phone No.
(619) 595-1655

ORANGE COUNTY

Map & Directions

2 Park Plaza
Suite 870
Irvine, CA 92614

Phone No.
(949) 535-2000

El CAJON

Map & Directions

900 N. Cuyamaca St., Suite 101
El Cajon, CA 92020

Phone No.
(619) 595-1655


© 2018 | RJS Law Firm | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy.